Thursday, January 17, 2008
Introduction
Television is my weakness. I love I Love Lucy, Prison Break, House, M*A*S*H, Court Shows, Talk Shows, Games Shows…basically anything but Soap Operas. I also love movies, my favorite of which is A Christmas Story.
I have the biggest small family I know. Confused? Let me explain. I have an immediate family of four (what I would consider small), but I have step-siblings up the wazoo. I have one full sister who is two years younger than me, and the baby of the whole family. I have two step-sisters and two step-brothers from my step-dad, and a step-brother and step-sister from my step-mom, making me the second youngest of eight. Since none of them have ever lived with me, I’ve only experienced being one of two kids, which is why I’d say I have a small, albeit large, family. I love to spend time with my nieces, nephews, and younger cousins. I’ve found over the years that the perfect age group is between 8 and 11 because they are old enough to have semi-intelligent conversations with, but they are young enough to still want to please you and do as they are told.
If I had a super-power, I would totally want to fly. I’ve been obsessed with it since my days of watching Peter Pan, another favorite movie of mine. I think I’d also want mind-reading abilities, that way I could easily out-wit anyone. Along those lines, one of my favorite hobbies is to argue. Not full-on arguing, but bantering, or debating. I love to convince people I’m right, but I don’t have a problem admitting when I’m wrong.
As far as my political views go, I’d say I’m open. Voting, for me, is more like choosing the lesser of two evils, not picking the best of the bunch. I do have a tendency to lean more towards the Democratic side when it comes to public programs, though.
I’ve always wanted to help people that can’t help themselves, and would love to help children in my future career. This attribute is probably the reason behind my great love for animals.
I guess the most important thing about me is that I find no need to try to please others. Of course I’m polite, and very respectful and caring of my friends and family, but I am satisfied with who I am, and am not wiling to change that in order to win the approval of someone else.
Monday, January 14, 2008
John Chapman: Disney's Version Vs. Pollan's
Pollan, on the other hand, is an author who is not concerned about if unsuitable content in his book will prevent young children from reading it, because his target audience is mainly adults. His view on John Chapman is more biographical or historical than Disney's. He is more focused on the facts, rather than just making a catchy story to sell. Pollan seems to want to look at the darker side of John Chapman, and points out the many things that shroud Chapman's story. He includes things such as the child bride and alcohol, which would never make it into a Disney cartoon. Pollan is out to set the story straight, and to show that John Chapman was just a regular person, who was in it for the money, and that he was not some hero of the frontier.
The Pollan version of John Chapman is much more believable, because Disney is more likely to not include incriminating facts about so-called role models, because there's a profit in it for them.
What it be vs. what we see … Johnny Appleseed.
Disney aims to tell a great story of a real American hero and role model, Johnny (Appleseed) Chapman, to young children with the hope to inspire them (to maybe appreciate nature). Although Mr. Chapman was real, and his apple trees were real, Disney doesn’t mention some truths Michael Pollan retrieved through his journey when researching the story of the Apple. People along the frontier (as it moved west) did appreciate and know of Johnny Appleseed, but for different reasons. We learn that most of Johnny’s apples went into a bottle of cider, and not served in those yummy foods Disney describes such as apple pies, fritters, cakes, and etc. So people really appreciated the apples because of the alcohol it provided, and some people even deemed it healthier than water. They took Johnny Appleseed in and we want to see it from Johnny’s eyes to see the difference between Pollan’s and Disney’s perceptions. From Disney’s perception, Johnny did stumble across small communities, but he was modest about it. He told his animal friends that he didn’t have the time to receive gratitude from the people because he has to go off planting more trees. In real life, I would presume that Johnny was welcomed into people’s home to sleep and relax. Basically, it wasn’t all about the apples in real life. It was also about the “privileges” that came along with being a hero such as free meals here and there and a place to stay for the night.
Pollan also mentions a rather interesting fact about the apples and humans co-evolving with each other. It is true that we only see it as a one way thing where we benefit from the apples (and everything else we favor to grow), but we are really helping them out big time too. The apples “know” that they need to be on our good side to survive, so generations pass by and they adapt, according to
Pollan uses his story of traveling to
Disney vs. Pollan
Disney presents Johnny Appleseed as a hero of American history- a good-doer with only selfless intentions of sharing the fruit of the apple tree. Disney’s goal is to paint a pretty picture of John Chapman, with a fairytale like ending. Their target audience is children and their parents, whom have their children in mind. The intent of the video is not to retell the true story of John Chapman, but to paint a pretty picture and create a happy ending. Disney provides parents with a positive role model for their children, a simple-minded, animal-loving man of song with good intentions; a man that selflessly protects nature for future generations to come. No where is there any hint as to the true intentions of John Chapman.
John Pollan’s more realistic yet cynical retelling in The Botany of Desire, however, is targeted for an adult audience. These adults do not need nor want the fairytale ending that Disney provides for children, but rather would prefer the true version of historical happenings. They want to know what John Chapman was really about. Pollan provides that Chapman was not the selfless man that he was made out to be in American folklores. The infamous Johnny Appleseed was actually planting these apple trees because of the economic benefits that would be reaped by having trees on one’s land. In this historical take, the production of apple cider is another large benefit of owning an apple tree. This version conflicts greatly with the one that Disney likes to sell, a story of innocence and responsibility to the earth. There is no harm in preferring either version of this story. Both provide positive points of a man of innovation and longevity.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Johnny Appleseed vs. Disney Post 1
Johnny Appleseed vs. John Chapman
The term “American Hero” is usually reserved for
With Disney’s target audiences ranging from toddlers to preteen, rhetoric cannot be too intimidating. In order to attract that age group Disney employs unconventional techniques of singing and pretty pictures to satisfy logos, ethos, and pathos. However, Pollan’s target audience is a little smarter than the Disney’s target audience where songs and pretty picture will only have negative effects on the ethos. Adding to the list of Pollan’s problems, Pollan is trying to convince the audience that apples have manipulated humans. Pollan responds to his problems by using excessive amount of hyperbole. He is overtly asserting cynical views of Johnny Appleseed to discredit Chapman as an American legend. As a result, circumstances surrounding Chapman’s myth is demystified and the audience begins to see John Chapman the homeless wonderer not Johnny Appleseed the American hero. With John Chapman in people’s minds, Pollan begins to assert the ideas that apples simply exploited Chapman into doing those deeds in order to secure a place in
Although Pollan’s rhetoric is far superior to Disney’s I still find Pollan’s theory hard to believe. Pollan does an excellent job to convince me that the apples are manipulating humans but c’mon. Who the hell really buys this crap? It is an interesting theory, but Pollan gives apples too much credit. I find Pollan’s apples manipulating human theory as ridiculous as Disney’s Indians and white settlers of
Pollan v. Disney
John Chapman, more commonly known as Johnny Appleseed, is depicted in contrasting ways in the first chapter of Michael Pollan’s The Botany of Desire and in Disney’s animated short film Johnny Appleseed. Within the first minute of the film, Disney depicts Johnny as very jolly, singing young man who loves picking apples whereas Pollen introduces Chapman as a man sleeping in a canoe somewhere along the
johnny appleseed
Pollan vs. Disney
Johnny Appleseed
The two stories, themselves, are even told in a different manner. The Disney version is told in a tall tale fashion, where guardian angels, laughing chipmunks, and souls exist. Pollan’s version is told from a first person point of view, where the facts are plainly laid out as he discovers them. The goal of the Disney telling is to provide wholesome entertainment for children with mild educational content. Pollan’s goal is simply to find out how John Chapman contributed to the spread of apples across the Midwest, and due to the more scientific, unbiased nature of Pollan’s telling of the Johnny Appleseed story; it is the truer of the two versions.